Crystalens AO Review
This article will discuss the results of my Crystalens IOL implant, a procedure that was done during my cataract surgery. It is the fourth in a series of articles on my own experience of developing cataracts and having the problem diagnosed, choosing an artificial lens for the implant, the cataract surgery, and costs, and finally, this one.
Before going further, I want to emphasize that every patient is different, and you may very well experience different results than I did. Even if you have the same lens implanted, you may have a different outcome. My purpose in writing this article is to give you an idea, based on my own experience, of what you might experience. Please keep that in mind while reading.
A Short History
A very short recap of what has happened for those readers that did not follow this series from that first description of finding symptoms of cataracts and having it diagnosed may be in order.
I first thought I might have cataracts over a year ago and had that diagnosed by an optometrist during a regular eye exam. Lots and lots of research followed as I learned about the various intraocular lens (IOL) implants that were available, as well as what cataract surgery entailed and what it would cost. I had the surgery done on my left eye in April, leaving the right eye for a later date. The cataract in that eye was not nearly as bad, and I still had considerable vision left there (although far from perfect)—it was a reasonable choice.
I chose the Crystalens as an IOL and was given the Crystalens AO model. Crystalens has made several major improvements over the years, and this is the latest model, showing several improvements. The biggest difference is that it is larger in size than the earlier HD model—this is expected to help reduce glare and halos at night.
Typical Results of a Crystalens Implant
Bausch and Lomb gives an overview of their clinical trials of some 500 eyes implanted with a new Crystalens IOL on their website. Among the data are the following facts:
- All the patients receiving two implants could, without glasses, pass a driver's license test.
- All recipients could see at mid-range distances or about 24" to 30". Such things as computer usage, the dashboard of a car, and grocery store prices fall into this range.
- 98.4% could read well enough without corrective lenses to read a newspaper or look up a number in a phone book.
- Over 80% reported that they were not wearing glasses for computer usage, putting on makeup, or shopping.
- Most patients with two implants could see at 20/32 without glasses. While not perfect, this is good. The surgeon that operated on my eyes mentioned that his own vision was only 20/25.
- 85% reported little to no problems driving at night, and the same number did not wear glasses at night. Bear in mind here that one of the major problems with lens implants is glare at night and that the lens is smaller (lets in less light) that a biological lens.
Some patients, of course, still required glasses for reading or computer usage (particularly reading), but they were definitely a minority. As my cataracts had developed to the point that reading a newspaper for more than 10 or 15 minutes with glasses was impossible, this all sounded very exciting. Yes, there are risks, and some patients ended up with 20/40 long-distance vision or worse, but overall the statistics are impressive.
The Crystalens IOL Begins To Take Effect
As was mentioned in the earlier article, I was given eye drops to dilate my left eye for an extended period of time—that eye was to be dilated for about ten days. This also paralyzes the muscles that allow the eye to focus, meaning that mid- and near-range vision would not be good during that time. Long-distance vision was very good (given that the eye is dilated), and colors were deeper and much more vibrant. Whites were white for the first time in years instead of yellowed. I did not need glasses for the first time in a decade to drive or have long-distance vision.
By the fourth day, I was beginning to almost use a computer without glasses. The dilation had decreased a little, and that is probably what made the difference; I still could not detect any focusing ability at all. That day was a real test as well; With specific permission from the doctor, I played a round of golf. By the end of last year, I was unable to follow the ball past about 100 yards; a 7-iron would take it out of sight, and I lost a lot of balls that way. It was with great interest that I teed off on the first hole, and it was with even greater delight that I found I could actually see that little white ball falling through the sky well over 200 yards away. There were three others in my group, all much younger and with good eyesight, but I seemed able to follow the ball at least as well as they could. I took it as an indication of what the future held and have not been disappointed.
On day 6, I became concerned the dilation in the eye had decreased to nearly nothing; as I understood it would last 10 days, I felt it best to call the doctor. Told that I was right on track and this was normal, I then asked if I should begin reading (or trying to) without glasses. The answer was yes, and that night I read part of the newspaper for the first time in years and years without the use of glasses. It didn't work well and caused my eyes to burn a little, but I worked at it as this is a part of "training" and "strengthening" of the muscles of the eye when a Crystalens is implanted. The rest of the evening was spent at the computer, marveling that I could see the monitor just fine without the aid of prescription lenses.
Another concern communicated to the doctor was that I was seeing a very brief flash of shadow at the extreme edge of my peripheral vision. I was told this was probably the edge of the lens and would most likely disappear as the dilation wore completely off. It could also indicate that the lens has moved within my eye; the three-week check will tell the story there.
At the twelve-day mark, I sat down to go through my evening struggle with reading the paper as I did every night and got a pleasant surprise. There was no pain after 30 minutes (normally, 10 minutes is about all I could take), and the print was quite clear—better than it used to be with glasses. A very encouraging sign.
A Three-Week Checkup On The New Crystalens
At just under a month, I had a thorough check-up on the eye. My concerns at that point were that I was still seeing a flash of a curved shadow whenever I moved the eye to look at something and that it often felt like something was in it; a scratchy feeling on the left side. In trying to place exactly where the curved shadow was, I found that I had double vision at the far left side of my peripheral vision: as I looked straight ahead and slowly brought my hand from behind on the left side, I saw two hands for a short distance. As it passed the location of that shadow, the "ghost" hand disappeared and appeared normal. This was not particularly objectionable but rather a curiosity. The shadow was more objectionable, particularly when quickly scanning a written page or a grocery shelf for a particular product—it came and went with such extreme rapidity that it was almost constant.
Read More From Patientslounge
Although I had been very concerned that the lens had moved within the eye and would need a second surgery to properly locate it once more, that fear was dispelled by the exam. The Crystalens, even though larger than earlier models, is still smaller than the natural organic lens we are born with, and that curved shadow I was seeing was the edge of the lens. It was explained to me that over time the brain would learn to ignore that shadow, and it will effectively disappear. The double vision at the very edge of my vision was unusual (the doctor had never heard of anyone complain of that), but I am certain that it is connected; it occurs only where there is no lens for the light to pass through.
Distance vision was still measured at 20/20, with near vision at a J5 level, one step worse than normal. These were the same results I had gotten during the 24-hour checkup.
At this point, I was able to read a newspaper occasionally, but not for long periods; it's as if the muscles of the eye tire very rapidly and easily. Early in the morning, the experience was better, while reading late at night didn't work well at all, and I could only read for a few minutes.
Computer usage—mid-range vision—is very good, and long periods of computer work pose no problem at all without glasses. I hadn't worn glasses, except for reading or other near vision tasks, since the surgery.
YAG and Lasik Laser Treatments After Cataract Surgery
Yag Laser Treatment
Approximately 20% of cataract surgery patients will develop a fogging of the posterior capsule that contains the lens, the result of epithelial cells left after the cataract surgery growing onto the capsule.
The treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacity is done via a YAG laser. In most cases, the eye will be dilated, and the portion of the capsule in the vision line of sight will be removed by the laser without ever touching the eye. Recovery and return to normal routines is immediate, although many surgeons will prescribe an anti-inflammatory medication for a few days.
The treatment is entirely painless with no post-operative discomfort. It is also very effective in restoring vision. There may be a few "floaters," but these normally resolve within a few weeks.
At my first 24-hour checkup my doctor indicated that I would likely need a YAG treatment, but the three-week check did not confirm this; there was no indication that it would be needed. It was still early, however, and that could change.
Lasik surgery is also done with a laser, but for very different reasons. Each lens implanted is a specific prescription, just for that eye. Very precise measurements of the eye are taken and used to produce that lens, but the procedure is not always perfect and can leave something to be desired in vision. Lasik surgery can be used to reshape the cornea of the eye, focusing the light better on the back of the eye; by doing this, it can correct for deficiencies in choosing the exact prescription for a lens implant.
Recuperation from Lasik is not too different from that of cataract surgery. This is not surprising as the eye is opened for the laser to operate properly and must heal. Although quick, patients must not drive on the day of the surgery and will need a driver to get home. Most people suffer no pain, but a few do need pain medication. Activity may be limited for a few days and nothing strenuous for up to 2 weeks. Most patients will see quick improvement in vision, but some require a few days for full vision to be restored.
At my three-week check, there was no indication that Lasik would be helpful, but it was still a little early to know for sure. If I retain the 20/20 vision I currently have, and there is no reason to think I won't, Lasik surgery would provide no benefit.
Final Thoughts About Crystalens
At about five weeks after the surgery, there is no doubt in my mind that I've made the right choice for me. I still can't read well without "cheaters" although that experience varies. A restaurant menu in dim lighting after a long day of trying to focus at just a few inches distance was beyond my abilities just last night but this morning's newspaper was readable in bright light for instance. I still think that how much I have recently used the focus ability of the eye plays a large part in whether I can read as the eye tires rapidly.
The dark shadow is almost gone, visible only in bright sunlight, and hardly noticeable even then. There is still some "scratchiness" some days, but that is fading too and a simple nonprescription eyedrop quickly alleviates the symptoms when they do occur.
The bottom line is that I am very pleased with the result. If I never develop the ability to read for long periods without glasses I will still be quite happy. I spend more time on a computer than I do with a book and I would rather be able to do that without glasses even if I do need a cheap pair of reading glasses to read a book. In addition, I recently purchased an e-reader and find that by now I need no glasses to use it - increasing the brightness and print size somewhat gives me something that I can use for several hours without any trouble, and without glasses.
I will need to have the other eye done, probably within a few months, and actually look forward to the experience as I think there is little doubt that having both eyes done will help the reading aspect. As my surgeon commented, eyes are designed to work together and results are better when they can. Reviewing my experience, the costs and the results of the Crystalens implant it is apparent that, for me, it has been very worthwhile and I would (and will) repeat it in the future.
There is just one more article in this series, describing the procedure and effects of having a YAG laser on both eyes. By the time the laser procedure was done, the second eye had had cataract surgery nearly a year prior, and the vision results of the second eye are also reported.
This content is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and does not substitute for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, prescription, and/or dietary advice from a licensed health professional. Drugs, supplements, and natural remedies may have dangerous side effects. If pregnant or nursing, consult with a qualified provider on an individual basis. Seek immediate help if you are experiencing a medical emergency.
© 2012 Dan Harmon
Dan Harmon (author) from Boise, Idaho on September 29, 2017:
Hi, Tina. Yes, I felt as if something was in the eye, though I don't recall it lasting that long. I never did find out if it was the incision or something else, but it did go away. I suggest you talk to your Dr. about it - he can take a look and see if there is something there or maybe the incision isn't healing just right. My eye also watered some for quite some time, but it seems like I quit using tear drops after only a couple of weeks.
Yes, I had the Yag treatment done after the second eye. It took two visits again, one for each eye. Near the end of the article is a link to another article on having that done, but here it is again: https://healdove.com/eye-care/YAG-Laser-Review-Aft...
Tina on September 29, 2017:
Thanks for the information, I had surgery done on one eye Chrystalense ao50, about 3 months ago. My eye does not feel normal. I fee like there is something in my eye. It is very unconfortable, I blink more than normal, and my eye waters a lot. I use a lot tear drops, but nothing seem to help. I am scheduled to have the second eye done, but I am very afraid to do it. My Dr. told me I will need to have Yag done after I do the second eye. Can you tell me if you had any of these symptoms? Thank you
Dan Harmon (author) from Boise, Idaho on February 18, 2016:
Real sorry to hear your experience. I know it happens to some, and wish it didn't. I, too, have some halo at night, but far less than without the lens. And I still usually use reading glasses to read a book, although short periods like a restaurant menu I don't. I hope your next surgery goes better for you.
paul on February 18, 2016:
I'm glad it worked for you. But like many I have heard from wish I had never had the surgery. I'm 54 and had the surgery for my right eye three years ago. Prior to that I never wore glasses until I was 48 and even then they were reading glasses. Colors are brighter but at night time the halos are worse then I ever had with cataracts which makes driving a challenge. I was told that with Crystal lens I would be able to see near far and everywhere in between (see brochure) That's a bunch of crap. I have middle distance at best and I still need reading glasses. The cataracts in my left eye is getting worse and I know I will have to do something soon and I guarantee it won't be with a Crystalens
Dan Harmon (author) from Boise, Idaho on April 12, 2014:
Sorry to hear you have a bad result from your surgery. It happens, both because of a poor choice of lenses, poor surgery, defective lens, and a poor match between patient and lens. Any or all could be affecting your results.
Can'tSee on April 11, 2014:
Ugh. All of you so excited about the Crystalens makes me wonder if you are paid by Bausch and Lomb to make positive comments. I have read so many complaints, I guess it just makes me feel good to know that I'm not alone. Over 4K out of pocket for this thing, and it's just an awful lens. My vision is worse than it was previous to the procedure. I hate that I spent so much on this lens. I probably would have seen, literally, better results with a cadaver lens.
Dan Harmon (author) from Boise, Idaho on March 08, 2014:
Melissa, I agree - it is tremendously scary. "You're going to slice my EYE open!? You just THINK you are!". But it was all worth it and I would do it ten times over for the results I've gotten. Having my vision back, well, it is worth whatever it takes and 15 minutes on the OR table was nothing.
Melissa Barrett on March 08, 2014:
Thank you for recommending these hubs to me. Although I found the description of the surgery in the last hub terrifying (I'm a big baby) I am glad for the reassurance that I will be able to see clearly again at some point. This series of hubs really helped. Again, thank you.
godencoin on March 12, 2013:
Thanks for your detailed experience. This review somehow makes me to decide on Crystalens
Dan Harmon (author) from Boise, Idaho on November 13, 2012:
@tsmog - This procedure is surgery, and every surgery in the world carries at least some risk, but that risk is very, very minor with cataracts. Tell Jerry to get off his duff and get his eyesight back!
I've recently found my own eyesight deteriorating slightly again as my second cataract develops more and more. This time there will be no waiting; I've decided to have the second eye done next month and wait eagerly to see what it brings. No, I don't look forward to the recover period, but it short and at most a minor irritation. It's worth far more than that to be able to see.
There are three other hubs in this series on my surgery; can I suggest that your friend read through them all? They are written to discuss and explain different aspects, from developing cataracts, to choosing a lens, the surgery itself and this final one on my long term experience with the new lens.
Tim Mitchell from Escondido, CA on November 13, 2012:
Thank you for the many insights with the adventure shared with both procedure and recovery. I am happy you discovered much from this while offering experience for those who have questions and, yes, maybe a fear too. To know of what to expect offers knowledge. Jerry down the street is pondering this and has some reservations, yet I think a print and drop by will do the trick. I thank you Wilderness for providing that opportunity of care to a friend.
Penelope Hart from Rome, Italy on November 13, 2012:
Well done again wilderness, this is just so helpful. Taking days and days to recover from eye surgery must be frightening and so your descriptions of how long it takes and why and what to do about it - and such a great end result, is invaluable to anyone who needs to know about Crystalens. Glad you're seeing fine without glasses - good story.
Dan Harmon (author) from Boise, Idaho on June 02, 2012:
You are certainly welcome, Rebecca. You're right in that our eyes are our windows to the world and mine were slowly closing off and nearly useless.
It is absolutely wonderful to be able to see again, and to be able to do so without glasses (I hated wearing them) is frosting on the cake.
Rebecca Mealey from Northeastern Georgia, USA on June 02, 2012:
Thanks for such an in-depth description of Chyrstelans. It is always a good idea to be informed of any eye disorder. Our eyes are not only the windows to our souls, they are the windows to the world.